As Ontarians brace for the lasting economic and social impact of COVID-19. Legal community is faced with increased uncertainty. The offices are being closed, lawyers temporarily laid off and the court scheduling unclear. This short article aims to answer general questions regarding court operations and provide guidance to the family law only processes that can be brought before Ontario Family Courts in these trying times.
How are the courts being managed?
In Ontario the courts are allowed to manage their own process. This means that they can create rules and regulations on a local (municipal) level regarding procedural issues. These procedural rules are posted on the Superior Court website under Notices to Profession. The rules can vary greatly, for example some courts allow to book pre-trials online while others require special forms to be filed. Your family lawyer will know the process in each court so the deadlines aren’t missed because of technicality.
Are the courts closed?
After the severity of COVID-19 was recognized, Chief Justice issued a number of directions and orders. A number of notices to profession were issued as well. On March 15, 2020 the courts issued a notice to profession suspending all of the regular operations. In Family Law context this notice is without end date, meaning that the suspension could continue indefinitely. More specifically, the court adjourned (postponed) all non-urgent matters scheduled to be heard on or after March 17, 2020. This means that all non-urgent family law motions, case conferences, settlement conferences were postponed without a date. At the time of writing this article, court remains open for filing only.
What if I have a deadline I am afraid to miss?
On March 20, 2020 an Order was issued under the Emergency Management and Civil Protections Act. This order suspends all limitation periods (deadlines) from March 16, 2020 and until this order is cancelled. There are certain global deadlines in Family Law that should be met. For example, there is a strict deadline in Family Law Act which prohibits Applications for Equalization of family property after certain period of time has passed. In practice the courts have wide discretion when it comes to dealing with deadlines, and will likely review them case by case basis. In any event when dealing with deadlines consult with an experienced family lawyer to know your rights and risks.
What’s happening in the courts right now?
On April 2, 2020 the courts updated the Notice to Profession. The update facilitates court vide-conferencing or “virtual courtroom”. The courts started hearing cases over limited issues:
- Urgent Family Law Matters;
- Case Conferences over very limited issues (1-2 issue per case conference);
The courts allowed service and filing of documents to be done via email, if at a later time the document must also be filed in person.
What is urgent? Will my case fall into this category?
The requirement for urgency is key and acts as a separate gateway when the Judges consider family law issues. In essence the judge first decides if your case meets the definition of urgency, if it does not, the court disposes of the matter without hearing substantial issues.
Over the course of the past few weeks I have reviewed a myriad of cases where spouses argued that their matter is urgent. In their decisions, judges rely on two recent cases which examine urgency in light of COVID-19.
First decision is Ribeiro v. Wright, 2020 ONSC 1829, released March 24, 2020. Justice Pazaratz set out principles to aid in the determination of urgency with respect to parenting issues under COVID-19 emergency. Justice Pazaratz highlighted that the aim of the courts is to maintain important parental relationships in a safe way.
Justice Pazarats concluded that in most situations the courts will not intervene if the spouses have an existing parenting order or arrangement unless there’s an urgent situation relating to COVID-19. There are circumstances where the court may choose to intervene:
- The courts may intervene to postpone parent’s scheduled time with a child, for example if a parent is under personal restrictions such as self-isolation for 14 days, due to travel or exposure to the illness.
- In some cases, the courts may provide directions on direct contact with a child if there is a personal risk factors through employment or associations
- The courts may also choose to intervene if lifestyle or parental behavior in the face of COVID-19 may necessitate restrictions on parenting time. Justice Pazaratz highlighted that there would be zero tolerance for a parent who recklessly exposes a child to any COVID-19 risk.
- Finally, the courts may provide directions if there are risk factors related to the health or other circumstances of a child or other members of a household that may necessitate adjustments.
This list is a non-exhaustive outline of the circumstances when the courts will likely decide that the matter is urgent
.
The Second case is Thomas v Wohleber, 2020 ONSC 1965. In this case Justice Kruz provided guidance on what constitutes urgency at the present time:
- The concern must be immediate and cannot await resolution at a later date.
- The concern must be serious in the sense that it significantly affects the health or safety or economic well-being of parties and/or their children.
- The concern must be a definite and material rather than a speculative one. It must relate to something tangible (a spouse or child’s health, welfare, or dire financial circumstances) rather than theoretical;
- It must be one that has been clearly particularized in evidence and examples that describes the manner in which the concern reaches the level of urgency.
In summary, if your case falls within one of the exceptions outlined by Justice Pazaratz and follows the guidelines set out by Justice Kruz you may be able to bring an urgent family law motion by video or teleconference. Please contact our firm if you wish to consult with an experienced family law lawyer regarding your family law issue.